<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>machine-envy &#187; networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/category/networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:23:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Two excellent pieces of writing</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2009/02/10/two-excellent-pieces-of-writing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2009/02/10/two-excellent-pieces-of-writing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that I&#8217;ve hung up my hat at the Open Rights Group, I actually have time to read stuff for pleasure again. And it has been with great pleasure that I&#8217;ve read the two pieces listed below. Sometimes it doesn&#8217;t matter what you&#8217;re writing about &#8211; the quality of your prose sings through. In the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I&#8217;ve hung up my hat at the Open Rights Group, I actually have time to read stuff for pleasure again. And it has been with great pleasure that I&#8217;ve read the two pieces listed below. Sometimes it doesn&#8217;t matter what you&#8217;re writing about &#8211; the quality of your prose sings through. In the case of these two pieces, though, that quality is matched by the urgency of the subject matter. Enjoy.</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Bill Thompson on Digital Britain" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7867285.stm">Bill Thompson on Lord Stephen Carter&#8217;s interim <em>Digital Britain</em> report</a>, and why peer review beats Peer dictatorship every time.</li>
<li><a title="Peter Wilby on British society" href="http://newstatesman.com/economy/2009/02/housing-societies-essay">Peter Wilby&#8217;s cover piece for this week&#8217;s <em>New Statesman</em> </a>on the financialisation of British society.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2009/02/10/two-excellent-pieces-of-writing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t shoot the messenger</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/08/16/dont-shoot-the-messenger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/08/16/dont-shoot-the-messenger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newstatesman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openrightsgroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/08/16/dont-shoot-the-messenger/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week&#8217;s column at the New Statesman is a reaction to all the silly season stories calling for a complete ban of Facebook/YouTube/the internet.
Some people are so quick to judge. At the beginning of August, the national treasure that is Sir Elton John was reported, albeit by that other great national treasure, the Sun newspaper, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s column at the New Statesman is a reaction to all the silly season stories calling for a complete ban of Facebook/YouTube/the internet.</p>
<blockquote><p>Some people are so quick to judge. At the beginning of August, the national treasure that is Sir Elton John was reported, albeit by that other great national treasure, the <em>Sun</em> newspaper, as calling for a complete closure of the internet. Apparently, Reg was advocating an experimental halt to all internet traffic in order to see whether, as he believed it might, such a return to our creative roots would stem the tide of mediocrity in popular music. As part of his Luddite rant, Elton chastised <em>Sun</em> readers, telling them to &#8220;get out there &#8211; communicate&#8221;, which prompted one of my more sardonic email pals to quip: &#8220;You can see he&#8217;s really got the whole internet thing, can&#8217;t you?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the rest <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/200708160040">here.</a></p>
<p>The day after I wrote it, the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee released an <a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2007/08/10/lords-report-promotes-security-online/">altogether more sensible critique of personal security online</a>. It&#8217;s well worth a read, just for the amazing expert evidence their Lordships collected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/08/16/dont-shoot-the-messenger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We are the web</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/04/12/we-are-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/04/12/we-are-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[freeculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opendemocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After James showed me the web is us/ing us video, I wrote about it for my latest openDemocracy piece. It&#8217;s the first time I&#8217;ve been able to join up my interest in linguistcs with my interest in the information age, and I&#8217;m quite proud of the result.
After the Sandinista government took power in Nicaragua in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After James showed me <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g">the web is us/ing us</a> video, I wrote about it for my latest openDemocracy piece. It&#8217;s the first time I&#8217;ve been able to join up my interest in linguistcs with my interest in the information age, and I&#8217;m quite proud of the result.</p>
<blockquote><p>After the Sandinista government took power in Nicaragua in 1979, its reform of the education system included expanding the country&#8217;s schools for the deaf. The schools&#8217; methods had been harsh and broadly ineffective, consisting of drilling the children in lip-reading and spoken Spanish. But eventually &#8211; simply by bringing previously isolated deaf children together &#8211; they generated an unexpectedly positive side-effect.</p>
<p>Largely, the children had been living with hearing relatives, and had had no opportunity to communicate with other deaf children. Brought together, however, they pooled the makeshift gestures they had used at home. What resulted was a usable jargon that was all the children&#8217;s own. When new groups of deaf pupils arrived at the schools &#8211; their minds ripe for natural language-learning &#8211; they took the jargon of the older children and turned it into a fully-fledged, expressive language. Now known as Nicaraguan Sign Language, or Idioma de Señas de Nicaragua (ISN), this was the type of language, according to the Harvard psychology professor Steven Pinker, with which &#8220;a child can watch a surrealistic cartoon and describe its plot to another child&#8221;. It is a language that can be used in poems, jokes and life histories, one that &#8220;is coming to serve as the glue that holds the community together&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the rest <a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/media/we_web_4511.jsp">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/04/12/we-are-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The web is us</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/04/11/the-web-is-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/04/11/the-web-is-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Casbon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#8217;t seen it yet, check out the web is us/ing us.  Its good short film about the way the machine learns.  Not sure if we need to rethink all the things listed, but still good.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven&#8217;t seen it yet, check out <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g">the web is us/ing us</a>.  Its good short film about the way the machine learns.  Not sure if we need to rethink all the things listed, but still good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/04/11/the-web-is-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Busy, busy</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/01/16/busy-busy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/01/16/busy-busy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/01/16/busy-busy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday was my first day working with the Open Rights Group. It&#8217;s going to take me a while to gain pace with the rest of the team, and the bevvy of projects they&#8217;re working on both in terms of campaigns (e-voting, more IP stuff, and the European Television without Frontiers legislation are all under the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday was my first day working with the <a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/">Open Rights Group</a>. It&#8217;s going to take me a while to gain pace with the rest of the team, and the bevvy of projects they&#8217;re working on both in terms of campaigns (e-voting, more IP stuff, and the European Television without Frontiers legislation are all under the spotlight right now) and behind-the-scenes work.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been trying without success to get the widget in del.icio.us working so I can post links direct to this blog. In the meantime, here are a couple of titbits:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.01/posts.html?pg=6">Lawrence Lessig on net neutrality and municipal broadband in <em>Wired</em></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1991104,00.html">Unsigned punk band make top 40</a> (health warning: they are represented by the PR company Quite Good, who were responsible for all the <a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/media/mirrors_3616.jsp">noise</a> about Sandi Thom last year)</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/01/16/busy-busy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minibar pics</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/23/minibar-pics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/23/minibar-pics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/23/minibar-pics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Friday, Open Business, in collaboration with Bookmooch and Magnatune, held the inaugural MiniBar, a geek social meant to rival SF&#8217;s CC Salon. It was a whole lot cooler than most techie meets, being hosted in a warehouse bar off Bricklane and having actual DJs and everything.
Here I am with Open Business Hannah &#8211; you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="236" height="184" align="right" alt="Open Business Hannah and yours truly at MiniBar" title="Open Business Hannah and yours truly at MiniBar" src="http://static.flickr.com/103/303569321_c02acb3785.jpg?v=0" />Last Friday, <a href="http://www.openbusiness.cc/">Open Business</a>, in collaboration with <a href="http://www.bookmooch.com/">Bookmooch</a> and <a href="http://www.magnatune.com/">Magnatune</a>, held the inaugural MiniBar, a geek social meant to rival SF&#8217;s <a href="http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Salon">CC Salon</a>. It was a whole lot cooler than most techie meets, being hosted in a warehouse bar off Bricklane and having actual DJs and everything.</p>
<p>Here I am with Open Business Hannah &#8211; you can see lots more photos <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/prettypritchie/sets/72157594387277898/">here</a>. I was especially pleased to meet Ben Goldacre, who writes the <a href="http://www.badscience.net/">Bad Science</a> column for the <em>Guardian</em>, and Mark Pilkington, mission control for <a href="http://www.strangeattractor.co.uk/further/"><em>Strange Attractor</em></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/23/minibar-pics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The inevitable Second Life article</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/27/the-inevitable-second-life-article/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/27/the-inevitable-second-life-article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newstatesman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/27/the-inevitable-second-life-article/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It had to happen. After months waiting for my Second Life contact to get around to writing a piece for openDemocracy on theories of innovation in virtual worlds, I have been forced to rehash his thesis in the New Statesman:
&#8220;Those who have not yet heard about Second Life, the online virtual world, can&#8217;t have read [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It had to happen. After months waiting for my Second Life contact to get around to writing a piece for openDemocracy on theories of innovation in virtual worlds, I have been forced to rehash his thesis in the New Statesman:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Those who have not yet heard about Second Life, the online virtual world, can&#8217;t have read a newspaper for the past six months. Since May, when <em>Business Week</em> splashed the story of Anshe Chung, an in-world entrepreneur who dominates Second Life&#8217;s virtual real-estate market, all branches of the UK media have featured specials outlining the machinations of this playground of the imagination. Now Reuters has set up its own Second Life bureau, promising to break stories from the virtual frontiers.</p>
<p>&#8220;The media orgy was predictable. Here is a world that exists only on a rack of web servers in California. Yet more than half a million people (a population that&#8217;s growing furiously) log on for more than a week per month, on average. Could anything do more to confirm our fears of technology disconnecting us from reality?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the rest <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/200610300043">here</a>. One small note: it appears the subs at the New Statesman make no distinction between a &#8220;working week&#8221; (35-40 hours) and a &#8220;<strike>working </strike>week&#8221; (168 hours), rendering a reference in the article wildly inaccurate. The rest of us get to go home after dark, but poor sods, John Kampfner must have his subs on the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6083840.stm">&#8220;stay awake&#8221; pills</a>, turning round copy through the night in anticipation of the launch of their <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/200610300002">new website</a>. For reference, then, the <a href="http://wired.com/wired/archive/14.10/slfacts.html">Wired travel guide to Second Life</a> has excellent figures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/27/the-inevitable-second-life-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zittrain on OLPC</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/19/zittrain-on-olpc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/19/zittrain-on-olpc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/19/zittrain-on-olpc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking of ideas-in-progress, Prof Jonathan Zittrain gave a lecture at the LSE last Friday entitled: &#8220;What would you put on the one laptop per child?&#8221;. It was basically an introduction for development types to his generativity theory, via the $100 laptop initiative, but he tested a few interesting ideas during the lecture, which are worth [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of ideas-in-progress, Prof Jonathan Zittrain gave a lecture at the LSE last Friday entitled: &#8220;What would you put on the one laptop per child?&#8221;. It was basically an introduction for development types to his <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=847124">generativity theory</a>, via the <a href="http://laptop.org/">$100 laptop</a> initiative, but he tested a few interesting ideas during the lecture, which are worth repeating.</p>
<p>He seemed to propose the stripped-down laptop as an alternative to the dystopian &#8220;information appliance&#8221; of his theory. Then he posed the question, should OLPC laptops be identified as such on the network, so they can actively seek each other out to swap code? Or would this be a kind of discrimination, or a violation of privacy that outweighed the benefits of collaboration?</p>
<p>More for the ideas scrapbook&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/19/zittrain-on-olpc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Driving test for the info superhighway</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/19/driving-test-for-the-info-superhighway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/19/driving-test-for-the-info-superhighway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newstatesman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/19/driving-test-for-the-info-superhighway/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week&#8217;s column in the New Statesman stretches a metaphor. After Tony Neate, director of GetSafeOnline advised UK web surfers to &#8220;treat their PC like their car&#8221; and maintain it with regular updates, lock it away safely behind a firewall, etc, I go on to suggest that, if we want our PCs to remain open [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s column in the <em>New Statesman </em>stretches a metaphor. After Tony Neate, director of GetSafeOnline advised UK web surfers to &#8220;treat their PC like their car&#8221; and maintain it with regular updates, lock it away safely behind a firewall, etc, I go on to suggest that, if we want our PCs to remain open and flexible, we should learn how to drive them safely on the information superhighway. Funnily enough, the day after I filed this I went to a seminar at the Oxford Internet Institute chaired by Jonathan Zittrain, whose work on internet generativity I cite in the piece. The discussion &#8211; about &#8220;badware&#8221;, executable code that is not malware in the traditional sense, but dangerous in the wrong hands &#8211; bore out many of the ideas in this piece.</p>
<p>A trip to Brussels earlier this week served to do the same. We were there to discuss citizens access to information, and Shamit Saggar, professor of political science at the University of Sussex, said something that&#8217;s been ringing in my ears ever since: &#8220;The logical conclusion on the Gutenberg Press was compulsory schooling&#8221;. There&#8217;s a theory that bears exploring.</p>
<p>Anyway, for those that can bear a stretched metaphor or two, here&#8217;s the column (and before you ask, why the headline has referenced phishing is beyond me):</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Batten down the firewalls, release the anti-spyware hounds, and up the spam alert to red status: 21 per cent of us are now more worried about online crime than about being burgled. According to a survey for the UK&#8217;s Get Safe Online campaign, fear of being duped by hackers is enough to put some of us off going online altogether.</p>
<p>&#8220;And we&#8217;re right to be concerned. In the week the survey was released, coinciding with the national internet safety roadshow, Microsoft issued a record number of security patches for its software, and the online virtual world Second Life was attacked by a code storm of self-replicating grey goo&#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the rest <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/200610230040">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/19/driving-test-for-the-info-superhighway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google YouTube Tango&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/14/google-youtube-tango/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/14/google-youtube-tango/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/14/google-youtube-tango/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[openDemocracy&#8217;s Deputy Editor, David Hayes, points me to this excellent article from The Nation, which predicts that media megacorps will use the new web 2.0 environment to pollute our mental space in ways we cannot yet imagine:
&#8220;Advertisers are harnessing technology that targets and follows Internet users on their journeys through cyberspace, collecting data and tracking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>openDemocracy&#8217;s Deputy Editor, David Hayes, points me to this excellent article from <em>The Nation</em>, which predicts that media megacorps will use the new web 2.0 environment to pollute our mental space in ways we cannot yet imagine:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Advertisers are harnessing technology that targets and follows Internet users on their journeys through cyberspace, collecting data and tracking behavior. Virtual software marketing tools will be deployed across the digital landscape so that wherever we go, whatever we do do&#8211;e-mail, instant messaging, mobile communications or searches&#8211;we will be immersed in enticing content for the lifelong sell&#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the rest <a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061030/chester">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/10/14/google-youtube-tango/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.197 seconds -->
