<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>machine-envy &#187; music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/category/music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:23:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Busy, busy</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/01/16/busy-busy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/01/16/busy-busy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/01/16/busy-busy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday was my first day working with the Open Rights Group. It&#8217;s going to take me a while to gain pace with the rest of the team, and the bevvy of projects they&#8217;re working on both in terms of campaigns (e-voting, more IP stuff, and the European Television without Frontiers legislation are all under the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday was my first day working with the <a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/">Open Rights Group</a>. It&#8217;s going to take me a while to gain pace with the rest of the team, and the bevvy of projects they&#8217;re working on both in terms of campaigns (e-voting, more IP stuff, and the European Television without Frontiers legislation are all under the spotlight right now) and behind-the-scenes work.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been trying without success to get the widget in del.icio.us working so I can post links direct to this blog. In the meantime, here are a couple of titbits:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.01/posts.html?pg=6">Lawrence Lessig on net neutrality and municipal broadband in <em>Wired</em></a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1991104,00.html">Unsigned punk band make top 40</a> (health warning: they are represented by the PR company Quite Good, who were responsible for all the <a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/media/mirrors_3616.jsp">noise</a> about Sandi Thom last year)</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2007/01/16/busy-busy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guardian Triptych: Go Gowers!</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/12/10/guardian-triptych-go-gowers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/12/10/guardian-triptych-go-gowers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[freeculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/12/10/guardian-triptych-go-gowers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some really fab coverage on Gowers in the Guardian and the Observer, starting with this Leader from Friday&#8217;s edition:
&#8220;&#8230;The report was given a guarded welcome by the recently formed Open Rights group which campaigned strongly against extending the 50-year limit, but the war is not won yet. The Gowers report is only a staging post, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some really fab coverage on Gowers in the <em>Guardian </em>and the <em>Observer</em>, starting with this <a href="http://business.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1967526,00.html">Leader from Friday&#8217;s edition</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8230;The report was given a guarded welcome by the recently formed Open Rights group which campaigned strongly against extending the 50-year limit, but the war is not won yet. The Gowers report is only a staging post, a way of influencing UK government thinking before Whitehall submits its own policy to Brussels where the final decisions will be taken. The real lobbying has only just begun.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Then on Saturday one of my favourite writers, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,,1968140,00.html">Marina Hyde, throws in her twopence worth</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It was, of course, barely a fortnight ago that readers of these pages were pleased to take a lesson in political theory from my temporary Guardian colleague Mick Hucknall, the lead singer of Simply Red and a signatory of the aforementioned ad, who opened a presumably self-parodic opinion piece with the statement &#8220;copyright is fundamentally socialist&#8221;. Mick then contrived to conflate notions of intellectual property &#8211; and there&#8217;s something about &#8220;property&#8221; that grates with our fifth-form Marxist&#8217;s thesis &#8211; with solid leftwing values, though I&#8217;m afraid I&#8217;d rather lost track of his point by the second mention of &#8220;the free flow of ideas&#8221;, and realised we were being asked to conceive of a Beverley Sisters track as such.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>And finally, <a href="http://media.guardian.co.uk/medialaw/story/0,,1968486,00.html">new media heavyweight John Naughton files his</a> analysis on Sunday:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;American neocons like to say that the only things found in the middle of the road are &#8216;white lines and dead armadillos&#8217;. Much the same applies to intellectual property (IP)&#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>As someone who&#8217;s devoted the last two years to getting accessible arguments about IP into the national press, I&#8217;m celebrating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/12/10/guardian-triptych-go-gowers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Andrew Gowers interviewed</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/12/07/andrew-gowers-interviewed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/12/07/andrew-gowers-interviewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opendemocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/12/07/andrew-gowers-interviewed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My interview with Andrew Gowers has gone up on openDemocracy.
         
&#8220;&#8216;Look at the debates that there have been on intellectual property since the arrival of the internet. They have been loud and shallow. They have been between people who say everything&#8217;s free and you shouldn&#8217;t pay for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My interview with Andrew Gowers has gone up on openDemocracy.</p>
<p><font class="articleTxtBody"> <!-- start modules -->   <a name="0"></a>     </font></p>
<blockquote><p><font class="articleTxtBody">&#8220;&#8216;Look at the debates that there have been on intellectual property since the arrival of the internet. They have been loud and shallow. They have been between people who say everything&#8217;s free and you shouldn&#8217;t pay for anything and people who say everything&#8217;s mine, and you should pay for everything. And actually neither of them are right.&#8217; Andrew Gowers is sitting in a back room of the British government&#8217;s vast Treasury building. It&#8217;s just a few hours after the launch of his year-long <a href="http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/gowers_review_intellectual_property/gowersreview_index.cfm">review</a> of the framework governing intellectual property, a text he hopes will change the nature of the debate not just in Britain, but internationally.</font></p>
<p><font class="articleTxtBody">&#8220;The Gowers Review of Intellectual Property has been broadly welcomed by copyright campaigners&#8230;&#8221;</font></p></blockquote>
<p><font class="articleTxtBody">Read the rest <a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-copyrightlaw/gowers_4160.jsp">here</a>.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/12/07/andrew-gowers-interviewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recording industry goes into overdrive</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/29/recording-industry-goes-into-overdrive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/29/recording-industry-goes-into-overdrive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/29/recording-industry-goes-into-overdrive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As predicted, those who want the copyright terms in sound recordings extended are making a huge amount of noise this week. They&#8217;re explicit about their hope &#8211; that government will ignore the recommendations of an independent review that has taken nearly a year to complete, and give them what they think they want anyway.
If politicians [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As predicted, those who want the copyright terms in sound recordings extended are making a <a href="http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1958337,00.html">huge amount of noise</a> this week. They&#8217;re explicit about their hope &#8211; that government will ignore the recommendations of an independent review that has taken nearly a year to complete, and give them what they think they want anyway.</p>
<p>If politicians would like a clear view of how popular an extension of term is going to make them, they need look no further than the bevvy of responses to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,1954727,00.html">Mick Hucknall&#8217;s incredibly ill-advised piece</a> on Comment is Free last week. Even if you ignore the ad hominem stuff, the reaction&#8217;s pretty damning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/29/recording-industry-goes-into-overdrive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gowers infodrip: don&#8217;t extend term</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/27/gowers-infodrip-dont-extend-term/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/27/gowers-infodrip-dont-extend-term/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newstatesman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/27/gowers-infodrip-dont-extend-term/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahead of its official launch after next week&#8217;s pre-budget speech (12.30, Wednesday 6 December, economy fans) the BBC is reporting that the Gowers Review of Intellectual Property will recommend that copyright terms on sound recordings should not be extended.
Boingboing may be reporting this as a victory, but the battle isn&#8217;t over yet. The government will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahead of its official launch after next week&#8217;s pre-budget speech (12.30, Wednesday 6 December, <a href="http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/pre_budget_report/prebud_pbr06/prebud_pbr06_index.cfm">economy fans</a>) the BBC is reporting that the Gowers Review of Intellectual Property will recommend that copyright terms on sound recordings <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6186436.stm">should not be extended</a>.</p>
<p>Boingboing may be <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/11/26/victory_uk_recording.html">reporting this as a victory</a>, but the battle isn&#8217;t over yet. The government will need to agree with Gowers, and as we know, a lot of high-level lobbyists have been side-stepping the independent review and going <a href="http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/08/04/on-the-record-blair-wants-to-extend-copyright-terms/">straight to the top</a>. This week is <em>the</em> week to be making noise about why copyright terms shouldn&#8217;t be extended. My column in the New Statesmen this week is <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/nssubsfilter.php3?newTemplate=NSArticle_NS&#038;newDisplayURN=200611270046">dedicated to the issue</a>.</p>
<p>If you live in the UK and you haven&#8217;t signed ORG&#8217;s Release the Music <a href="http://www.releasethemusic.org/five-minutes/sign-our-petition/">petition</a> yet, get to it. So far the media have gone with the &#8220;Poor Cliff&#8221; angle, but <a href="http://www.releasethemusic.org/press/briefing-pack/">the other side of the story</a> needs to be told too. Can you <a href="http://www.releasethemusic.org/fifteen-minutes/blog-about-release-the-music/">write a blog post</a>/<a href="http://www.writetothem.com/">write to your MP</a>/<a href="http://www.releasethemusic.org/fifteen-minutes/give-testimony/">Give a Testimony</a> that will let the UK government know that Gowers has got it right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/27/gowers-infodrip-dont-extend-term/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Release the Music</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/17/release-the-music/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/17/release-the-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/17/release-the-music/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In all likelihood, the Gowers Review of intellectual property is already written. But, as it bounces between government departments for consultation, what it is going to say is still very much up for grabs. Which makes it all the more important, if you believe copyright in sound recordings shouldn&#8217;t be extended from 50 to 95 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all likelihood, the <a href="http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/gowers_review_intellectual_property/gowersreview_index.cfm">Gowers Review</a> of intellectual property is already written. But, as it bounces between government departments for consultation, what it is going to say is still very much up for grabs. Which makes it all the more important, if you believe copyright in sound recordings shouldn&#8217;t be extended from 50 to 95 years, that you go over to <a href="http://www.releasethemusic.org/">Releasethemusic.org</a> and sign their <a href="http://www.releasethemusic.org/five-minutes/sign-our-petition/">petition</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/11/17/release-the-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye and good riddance</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/09/21/goodbye-and-good-riddance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/09/21/goodbye-and-good-riddance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becky Hogge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newstatesman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/09/21/goodbye-and-good-riddance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week&#8217;s column in the New Statesman is a little dance around the grave of the music industry:
&#8220;Speaking as a reformed music journalist, it&#8217;s been fun watching the industry gasp its last breaths. First it sent peer-to-peer file-sharing underground with the closure of Napster in 2001. Now, it is suing its own fans. The music [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s column in the New Statesman is a little dance around the grave of the music industry:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Speaking as a reformed music journalist, it&#8217;s been fun watching the industry gasp its last breaths. First it sent peer-to-peer file-sharing underground with the closure of Napster in 2001. Now, it is suing its own fans. The music industry has struggled to cope with how its main export can now be translated into bits and sent down a series of tubes direct to its (not always paying) customers. And all the while, the music has only got better.</p>
<p>Vivendi Universal is the biggest of the remaining handful of bloated mega-corporations that have been suffocating innovation in the music industry since the late Eighties&#8230;.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the rest <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/200609250046">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/09/21/goodbye-and-good-riddance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.251 seconds -->
