<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cease and desist alive and well in the UK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/07/12/cease-and-desist-alive-and-well-in-the-uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/07/12/cease-and-desist-alive-and-well-in-the-uk/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: unbound</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/07/12/cease-and-desist-alive-and-well-in-the-uk/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>unbound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/?p=37#comment-383</guid>
		<description>David Shayler, whislteblower on MI6's shady and illegal operations suffered a more insidious de facto censorship than either Wright or Murray. Publication of his insights were held up for a year while they were vetted, but subsequently no major bookseller would stock the heavily blacked out final text. With the majority of booksales now in the hands of a few multinational companies, the gurus of the free market have been proved right again: there is nothing which can't be privatised- even the job of suppressing free speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[David Shayler, whislteblower on MI6&#8217;s shady and illegal operations suffered a more insidious de facto censorship than either Wright or Murray. Publication of his insights were held up for a year while they were vetted, but subsequently no major bookseller would stock the heavily blacked out final text. With the majority of booksales now in the hands of a few multinational companies, the gurus of the free market have been proved right again: there is nothing which can&#8217;t be privatised- even the job of suppressing free speech.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: machine envy :: The Crown’s copyright con</title>
		<link>http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/2006/07/12/cease-and-desist-alive-and-well-in-the-uk/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>machine envy :: The Crown’s copyright con</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.machine-envy.com/blog/?p=37#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] My fortnightly column for openDemocracy has just gone live, an extension of this post of last week: &#8220;It is nearly two decades since the British government tried to ban Spycatcher, and you would expect them to have learned their lesson. After throwing £2 million in legal expenses after the biography of former MI5 operative Peter Wright, her majesty&#8217;s government was forced to admit defeat in October 1988, leaving ministers red-faced and Wright seriously in the black, thanks to the free publicity afforded his book by his repeated trips to courts across the globe. Eighteen years on, it&#8217;s the turn of the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) to have a go. But this time they have a new weapon in their armoury – the vagaries of the British copyright system.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[[...] My fortnightly column for openDemocracy has just gone live, an extension of this post of last week: &#8220;It is nearly two decades since the British government tried to ban Spycatcher, and you would expect them to have learned their lesson. After throwing £2 million in legal expenses after the biography of former MI5 operative Peter Wright, her majesty&#8217;s government was forced to admit defeat in October 1988, leaving ministers red-faced and Wright seriously in the black, thanks to the free publicity afforded his book by his repeated trips to courts across the globe. Eighteen years on, it&#8217;s the turn of the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) to have a go. But this time they have a new weapon in their armoury – the vagaries of the British copyright system.&#8221; [...]]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.906 seconds -->
